Apology and Forgiveness
Norman Schultz
Research Assistant, Conflict Research Consortium
University of Colorado
Based on a longer essay on Apology and Forgiveness, written by Charles (Chip) Hauss for the Intractable Conflict Knowledge Base Project
Definition:
An apology is an expression of regret over some admitted past harm one has
caused.
Users:
While apologies are most often made by individuals, larger entities such as organizations and even countries have offered apologies.
Description:
Strictly speaking, making an apology means saying "I'm sorry" to
another party. Yet, as we all have probably experienced, just because someone
says they are sorry does not mean they really are. Sometimes apologies are
offered rather disingenuously, as mere placating or begrudging compliance to
expectation. Therefore, there is a distinct difference between what is
considered mere words and a genuine apology.
First, a genuine apology implies that the party feels responsible and is
therefore taking responsibility. While this might imply an admission of a
mistake, it can also effectively mean a reversal of previously held views or
policies. Secondly, a genuine apology is fueled by sincere regret for the past
harm caused. In other words, if given the chance to go back and do it all again,
the party would act differently. In this respect, the apology would include
little or no defense of one's past actions. Lastly, a genuine apology might
require that reparations be made - especially in the case that those who are being
apologized to are still being harmed as a result of past actions. Otherwise, the
offended party is likely to think of the apology as just words.
A genuine apology can be seen as an opportunity for both sides of a conflict
to enter into an improved relationship, and is an important step in that
direction. The new relationship can be based on a greater sense of mutual trust,
acceptance, and understanding than previously thought possible. Apologies can
take some of the sting of past harms away, along with the subsequent bitterness
and reluctance of the offended party to negotiate or have a continuing
relationships with the offender.
Apologies are a very important part of resolving or improving conflicts. Past
wrongs are often remembered and felt for a long time and at all levels, from the
hearts and minds of individuals to the policies and relations between countries.
Long-standing stumbling blocks to resolution can be overcome when one party
apologizes to the other. This can be difficult to achieve, though. Parties are
often very reluctant to admit they are wrong, especially when it implies expense in time and resources incurred in reversing past positions and making
subsequent reparations.
By the same token, the victims of those atrocities have to find the space in
their hearts to forgive those who victimized them, even though the pain and
suffering will never disappear. But forgiving is just as important as
apologizing in any society which wishes to put its struggles behind it and
create a more peaceful and cooperative future. Forgiveness, like apology, requires more than lip service to be genuine. It
means that the offended party has given up some of its feelings of resentment,
quite possibly implying they let go of what was previously thought of as moral
bargaining power.
Despite the saying "forgive and forget," accepting an apology by
offering forgiveness does not necessarily imply forgetting anything. Offended
parties may let go of some of their ill feelings toward the opposing party, but
they may not need or desire to forget past harms. By never forgetting the past, whatever valuable lessons learned are not lost, and those who died or were
otherwise harmed are dignified.
Example:
In 1997, U.S. President Bill Clinton offers an official apology on behalf of
the United States for slavery. Although the U.S. has not acceded to the
demands for direct "reparations," some compensation for past wrongs
has been given over the years in the form of affirmative action programs that
try to help blacks (and other people of color) make up for past acts of
prejudice and discrimination.
Application:
Apologies are valuable in many conflict situations from minor interpersonal
disputes to long-lasting, deep-rooted, and violent conflicts. In minor
interpersonal disputes, often an apology is all it takes to remedy the situation
and resolve the conflict for good. In long-lasting conflicts, apology is one,
albeit very difficult, step toward ultimate peace and reconciliation between the
parties.
Links to Related Articles:
Restorative Justice
|